Teen Girls and distractions 04/25/2012
A new study suggests that teen girls are far more likely than boys to engage in distracted driving behavior. "There's a remarkable difference between boys and girls when it comes to distracting driving habits. In almost every category we surveyed ... girls are more likely to engage in dangerous or distracting behaviors by almost 15%," said Angela Patterson of Bridgestone Americas, which conducted the study. The overwhelming majority of teen girls who responded to the study said that changing music on car stereos and playing loud music while driving distracted them. Eighty-three percent of teen girls also told researchers that having more than one passenger in the vehicle caused them to lose focus on the road. While the majority of teens admitted they are most likely to fidget with a radio while driving, they see it as less dangerous than other factors causing accidents. Teens perceive drunken driving, reading text messages and eating while driving, as well as having other passengers in the car, as the biggest distractions for drivers their age. Only one-third of teens in the survey said they believe that talking on the phone while driving is "very dangerous." Twenty percent of teens admitted typing the occasional text message while driving. Researchers suggest that for the most part, teens appear to be minimizing distractions while behind the wheel. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 16-year-olds have higher crash rates than drivers of any other age. But there's a downward trend in teen fatalities on the nation's highways. More than 3,400 teens died in motor vehicle crashes in 2009, but that death toll is 60% percent less than in 1975, according to the safety group. The full results of the study are posted on www.teensdrivesmart.com. Add Comment Distracted Driving Awareness Month 04/24/2012
April is National Distracted Driving Awareness Month and the traffic safety community has a simple message for drivers: One Text or Call could Wreck it All. Are you aware that in California, where texting and talking on a hand-held cell phone while driving are against the law, road fatalities have fallen by 22 percent? Closer to home, the Texas Department of Transportation is now encouraging drivers to refrain from engaging in non-driving activities while on the road, particularly cell phone use and texting. In its second year, TxDOT's Talk. Text. Crash. outreach campaign is designed to raise awareness of the horrible consequences of distracted driving. To learn more about the dangers of distracted driving and what you can do to prevent this deadly behavior, please visit distraction.gov ADHD and teenage drivers 04/03/2012
A number of cognitive conditions can affect driving, but the largest group of challenged teenage drivers — and the mostly closely studied — appears to be those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A 2007 study by Russell A. Barkley of the Medical University of South Carolina and Daniel J. Cox of the University of Virginia Health System, concluded that young drivers with A.D.H.D. are two to four times as likely as those without the condition to have an accident — meaning that they are at a higher risk of wrecking the car than an adult who is legally drunk. Researchers say that many teenagers with attention or other learning problems can become good drivers, but not easily or quickly, and that some will be better off not driving till they are older — or not at all. The most obvious difficulty they face is inattention, the single leading cause of crashes among all drivers. “When a driver takes his eyes off the road for two seconds or more, he’s doubled the risk of a crash,” said Bruce Simons-Morton, senior investigator at the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development in Bethesda, Md. Inexperienced drivers usually are distractible drivers. In a study on a closed course, teenagers proved much more adept than adults at using cellphones while driving, bujt missed more stop signs. But A.D.H.D. involves more than distractibility. Its other major trait is impulsiveness, which is often linked to high levels of risk-taking. Teenagers are more prone to crashes because of inattention, but “the reason their crashes are so much worse is because they are so often speeding,” said Dr. Barkley. Many drivers with A.D.H.D. overestimate their skills behind the wheel. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/health/add-and-adhd-challenge-those-seeking-drivers-license.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all NHTSA postponed rear visibility rule 02/29/2012
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has again postponed its final rule to expand rear visibility requirements in cars. The long anticipated rule would mandate backup cameras in all new vehicles in order to reduce the number of deadly backover accidents. According to Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, regulators have made significant progress, but further research and analysis is needed, so the final standards are now anticipated by December 31, 2012. The regulation is intended to address dangerous blind zones behind vehicles that NHTSA estimates cause 292 deaths and 18,000 injuries each year, with children and elderly the most vulnerable. According to the New York Times, “Among the details that regulators want to resolve are how quickly a camera image must appear on the screen when the driver shifts the vehicle into reverse gear and the size of the area that must be shown.” Backup cameras may be standard equipment 02/28/2012
On average, two children die and about 50 are injured every week when someone accidentally backs over them in a vehicle, according to KidsAndCars.org, a nonprofit group that pushed the government to begin tracking such tragedies. And more than two-thirds of the time, a parent or other close relative is behind the wheel. Now, auto safety regulators have decided to do something about it. Federal regulators plan to announce that automakers will be required to put rearview cameras in all passenger vehicles by 2014 to help drivers see what is behind them. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed the mandate in late 2010 and will soon send a final version of the rule to Congress. Cars are filled with safety features that have been mandated by government regulators over the years, including air bags and the third brake light, but the rearview camera requirement is one of the biggest steps taken to protect people outside of a vehicle. "We haven't done anything else to protect pedestrians," said Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety in Washington. "This is one thing we can do and should do." Regulators predicted that adding the cameras and viewing screens will cost the auto industry as much as $2.7 billion a year, or $160 to $200 a vehicle. The cost will be passed on to consumers through higher prices, but regulators say that 95 to 112 deaths and as many as 8,374 injuries could be avoided each year by eliminating the wide blind spot behind a vehicle. Government statistics indicate that 228 people of all ages - 44 percent of whom are under age 5 - die every year in backover accidents involving passenger vehicles. About 17,000 people a year are injured in such accidents. "In terms of absolute numbers of lives saved, it certainly isn't the highest," Mr. Ditlow said. "But in terms of emotional tragedy, backover deaths are some of the worst imaginable. When you have a parent that kills a child in an incident that's utterly avoidable, they don't ever forget it." Although they account for a small fraction of the deaths that result from automobile crashes, backovers are the most common cause of off-road deaths involving children and vehicles. As vehicles have become larger and designed to better protect occupants, drivers' ability to see any people or objects behind them has been reduced, said Dan Edmunds, director of vehicle testing at Edmunds.com. "Over time, the beltlines have risen, and the glass has gotten a little smaller in the interest of safety," Mr. Edmunds said. "There's certainly been a lot of attention paid to safety, but visibility hasn't necessarily been lumped in the same way." Edmunds now measures the size of the blind spot behind each new vehicle, based on how far back the driver can see a mannequin designed to resemble a small child. Although many backover incidents involve S.U.V.'s and trucks, Mr. Edmunds said some of the biggest blind spots are on passenger cars where the trunk has a high deck lid and the driver sits low to the ground. For the Cadillac CTS-V coupe, Edmunds measured a blind spot 101 feet long, compared with about 40 feet for minivans from Toyota and Honda. Automakers have generally supported the requirement, while some took issue with technical aspects of the backup camera proposal and the added cost. "We've had longstanding support for efforts to increase the field of view for these vehicles," said Wade Newton, of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Regulators studied other ways of improving rear visibility, including the beeping radar-based sensors that many vehicles already offer. But they determined that the sensors often did not detect moving people, especially children. Drivers also responded better to the camera image than the audio alerts. "Video camera-based systems are by far the most comprehensive and cost-effective currently available solution for reducing backover crashes, fatalities and injuries," according to NHTSA. Five Safety Resolutions for the New Year 01/25/2012
1. Always wear a safety belt. Safety belts save lives and help reduce the risk of serious injury in the event of a crash. Every passenger should wear a safety belt for every car ride, no exceptions. 2. Only use hands-free mobile devices. This year, vow not to call, text, sort music or otherwise play with your mobile device while behind the wheel. If you must talk on the phone while driving, use a hands-free headset or pull over to a safe location first. In 2009, 36 percent of crashes were caused by distracted drivers, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Enforce the rule with young drivers in your house too. Fifty percent of teens admit to texting while driving, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA). 3. Keep your cool. Let go of road rage. That means taking a deep breath when someone cuts you off rather than honking your horn or tailgating. It also means slowing down and steering clear if you see a driver acting erratically. The risks are real: Up to 56 percent of fatal crashes are caused by aggressive driving behavior according to the AAA Foundation. 4. Follow the speed limit. You may be in a hurry to save some time, but slowing down could save your life. According to NHTSA, speeding is a contributing factor in 31 percent of fatal crashes. Male drivers age 15 to 24 are particularly at risk—37 to 39 percent involved in fatal crashes were speeding. 5. Stay grounded in a skid. Electronic Stability Control (ESC) applies anti-lock brakes (ABS) to individual tires to help keep your car going straight in a slide. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requires all 2012 vehicles to include ESC, an improvement estimated to save up to 9,600 lives and prevent up to 238,000 injuries each year. If your car does not have ABS, tap your brakes to avoid locking your wheels and going into a slide. Rear-end collision research continues 01/07/2012
One-third of automobile collisions are rear-end collisions. If we could only figure out why they happen so frequently, perhaps we could avoid those collisions. Researchers have been working on this problem for a long time. In 1974, a psychologist named John Voevodsky decided to test his theory that drivers needed to see a dedicated brake light that would illuminate at the same time as the other two brake lights, thus forming a triangle of brake lights. He added his third brake light, mounted in the base of rear windshields. When drivers pressed their brakes, a triangle of lights warned following drivers to slow down. To test whether such a small addition would make a significant difference, Voevodsky equipped 343 San Francisco taxicabs with the third brake light and left 160 taxis with no additional light as a control group. Taxi dispatchers then randomly assigned taxi drivers to taxis with or without the third light. At the end of a 10-month experiment, taxis with a third brake light had suffered 60.6% fewer rear-end collisions than had the control-group taxis. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) repeated Voevodsky's experiment on a larger scale, and concluded that Center High Mounted Stop Lamps (CHMSLs) reduce accidents and injuries. As a result, NHTSA required all new cars (starting in 1986) and all new light trucks (since 1994) to have a third brake light. Unfortunately, subsequent research shows that the CHMSLs now only reduce rearend collisions by about 5%. The effect of the triangle of brake lights has apparently worn off. Researchers now consider what else to do. For example, at Virginia Tech, the latest idea is a flashing light that shows a difference between whether a car is slowing or stopping. The problem researches are trying to solve is that drivers find it difficult to judge whether the car in front intends to stop. The solution may be smart brake lights that glow amber in the center when a vehicle is slowing and flash red when stopping. When deceleration is rapid, all of the lights flash red. The flashing is supposed to alert the driver behind the brake lights. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, “Driver inattention is the leading factor in most crashes and near-crashes.” The smart brake system developed by Virginia Tech isn’t implemented in cars yet, but research is now being conducted on buses because they make frequent stops. Flashing lights mean danger 12/20/2011
Intersections with flashing lights have three times more accidents than those with only stop signs and intersections with highway frontage roads are high risk, a University of Texas study released Monday said. A civil engineering research team led by professor Chandra Bhat determined which intersections were the most dangerous so that future studies can consider how to make them safer. They used data collected by the Texas Dept. of Transportation. Roughly 40 percent of all traffic accidents take place at intersections, Bhat said. His study could not determine if flashing lights at intersections confused drivers or if traffic engineers have placed flashing lights at the most dangerous intersections. Drivers exiting highways are also more likely to crash, either because they are going too fast or switching lanes in a dangerous manner. "Understanding their causes should be a priority for transportation and safety professionals, so that we can develop countermeasures to reduce the high incidence of crashes and resulting deaths and injuries at intersections," Bhat said. A key finding of the study is that intersection accidents are affected by the larger traffic network around them, and that fixing a dangerous intersection will reduce accidents on neighboring streets. "If you don't account for this dependence, which is what almost all earlier studies have done, you underestimate the value of roadway and traffic control improvements," Bhat said. Intersections with traffic lights are the safest, the study found. But once an accident begins to develop, it is harder to stop, Bhat said. Researchers will present the findings at the National Transportation Research Board Meeting in Washington next month. Source: UTexas.edu Distractions cause crashes 12/20/2011
Texting and talking on cell phones are distractions that cause collisions. There were an estimated 3.092 deaths in crashes affected by distractions in 2010, according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. Overall, 32,885 people died in traffic crashes in the United States in 2010. The good news is that represents a 3 percent drop and the lowest number of fatalities since 1949. Traffic deaths have been declining steadily for several years. Why? Better designed and equipped cars. Bucking the trend, there were 4,502 motorcycle deaths in 2010, a 0.7 percent increase. Hit and Run drivers 11/23/2011
The hit and run driver leaves a mess in his wake: unpaid property damage, unpaid medical bills, unreimbursed lost wages, and frustration that someone would flee their responsibility. Texas law requires drivers to carry a minimum of $30,000 in liability coverage to protect the other driver from harm that might result from a collision; however, if a driver flees and no one can identify him, then no insurance claim against the negligent driver is possible and the victimized driver will have to turn to his own automobile insurance for Uninsured Motorist coverage. Hit and run accidents are a perpetual and growing problem. While state law requires that those involved in a collision to stop and exchange information, statistics indicate that the number of reported hit and run accidents increased almost 20% over the past decade. Some believe that the problem may be related to the growing number of illegal immigrants. After all, if an illegal, unlicensed immigrant causes a fatal accident and remains at the scene, he or she might risk detention and deportation. If the driver flees, that driver might not get caught and might suffer no consequences from the fatal act. But if the driver remains at the scene, the prospects aren't good. But illegal immigrants do not account for all hit and run accidents. Legal citizens of high status who don't want to risk bad publicity might flee the scene of an accident that has left injured or wrongfully killed victims. Drunk drivers who don't want the consequences of a DWI arrest will often try to flee if they can. People driving without a valid license or under a suspended license will try to flee so that they don't get caught for their crimes. And sometimes ordinary citizens who just don't want to take responsibility for their mistakes will flee the scene of a fatal accident. What is the solution? Like many complex problems, there is not an easy answer. Protect yourself by having UM/UIM coverage on your own automobile. |
RSS Feed